Fund returns and manager alphas are noisy: a strong-looking track record can easily be luck rather than skill, especially over short periods. The t-statistic tests whether an average excess return (alpha) is large relative to its own volatility, giving a concrete measure of confidence that the result isn't just random chance. A high alpha with a low t-stat is statistically meaningless, while a t-stat of 2 or higher indicates the outperformance is unlikely to be due to chance alone. Use the calculators below to check the significance of a fund's alpha, or to see how many years of data would be needed to draw a reliable conclusion.
Enter the average excess return (alpha) and its standard deviation to find the number of years needed for a t-stat of 2. A t-stat of 2 means you can be 97.5% (one-tail test) confident the excess return is not zero.
| x̄Average Excess Return (Alpha) %: | |
| sStandard Deviation of Alpha %: | |
| tt-stat: | 2 (fixed — 97.5% one-tail confidence) |
| nNumber of Years Needed for t-stat of 2: | — |
Enter the average, standard deviation, and sample size (number of observations) to calculate the t-stat. A t-stat of 2 indicates the average is statistically significant — 97.5% (one-tail test) confident the average did not occur by chance, with a remaining 2.5% probability that the true value is zero.
| x̄Average: | |
| sStandard Deviation: | |
| nSample Size: | |
| tt-stat: | — |