An effective and common method to measure the deviation of investment returns from the average is the standard deviation of returns. Standard deviation provides a statistical measure of historical volatility and sets forth a distribution of the ranges of probable outcomes. In investing, measuring standard deviation of returns shows the extent to which returns (daily, monthly or annual) are distributed around the average return, estimating a range of probable outcomes and establishing a framework of risk and return trade-offs.

The normal distribution in the form of a bell-shaped curve shown in Figure 8-1 illustrates the concept of standard deviation. The curve represents a set of outcomes. In this case, let’s say the outcomes are the monthly returns of an investment. The yellow area covered in one standard deviation away from the average in both directions accounts for approximately 68% of the outcomes in a period. The area within two standard deviations from the average, the yellow and green shaded areas, accounts for 95.6% of outcomes, and the area up to three standard deviations away from the average-illustrated by the yellow, green and orange shaded areas-accounts for 99.7% of all outcomes. The higher an investment’s standard deviation, the greater the chance that future returns will lie farther away from the average return.

*Figure 8-1*

Francis Galton, an English mathematician who was an expert in many scientific fields, created his “Quincunx” machine to demonstrate how a normal distribution is formed through the occurrence of multiple random events. He expressed his fascination with this phenomenon by stating, “I know of scarcely anything so apt to impress the imagination as the wonderful form of cosmic order expressed by the ‘Law of Frequency of Error.’ It reigns with serenity… amidst the wildest confusion. The huger the mob, and the greater the apparent anarchy, the more perfect is its sway. It is the supreme law of Unreason. Whenever a large sample of chaotic elements are taken in hand and marshalled in the order of their magnitude, an unsuspected and most beautiful form of regularity proves to have been latent all along.”^{1}

I commissioned the creation of a large, museum-quality Probability Machine to educate investors about the probability of outcomes that result from a series of random events. The machine helps to portray order in the midst of seeming chaos that is the random walk of Wall Street. In the stock market, random events are the news stories about a company or about capitalism in general, and the resulting prices of securities. The random drop of the beads, starting with a central point of a fair price, simulates a series of fair prices, ultimately forming a normal distribution in the shape of a bell curve. The distribution of the beads bears a strong resemblance to the distribution of monthly returns shown in red bars behind the beads, also shown in Figure 8-2, reflecting 600 monthly returns (50 years) for an all-equity index portfolio. Like the Probability Machine’s normal distribution, the portfolio carries a wide range of outcomes or a high standard deviation. It maintains an approximate normal distribution that accumulates to an average 1.14% monthly fair return over 600 months, but with a standard deviation of 4.67%, which is a high level of short-term volatility. The display of the beads that have randomly fallen, and yet consistently form a bell curve approximating the returns of a full equity portfolio is so powerful, I created a desktop version of the machine that is available worldwide. It is called “The Random Walker.”

*Figure 8-2*

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Performance of IFA Index Portfolio contains both live and backtested data. Please refer to ifabt.com for Sources, Updates and Disclosures.

Note the comparison to Figure 8-3, which shows a lower-risk index portfolio comprised of 90% fixed-income funds and 10% stock funds with a narrow range of outcomes. The 100% stock fund index portfolio in Figure 8-2 experienced greater price swings but had higher returns. Over the simulated 50-year period, a dollar invested in the low-risk index portfolio would have grown to $18.50, while a dollar invested in the higher risk index portfolio would have grown to $320.48. This historical data supports the presumption that investors who have the capacity to hold higher risks are expected to earn substantially higher returns.

*Figure 8-3*

Past performance does not guarantee future results. Performance of IFA Index Portfolio contains both live and backtested data. Please refer to ifabt.com for Sources, Updates and Disclosures.

- -1 J. R. Newman (ed.)
*The World of Mathematics*, New York: Simon and Schuster, 1956. pg. 1482.

- All
- Recent
- Articles
- Videos
- Quotes
- Books
- Terms

The data provided in all charts referring to IFA Index Portfolios is hypothetical backtested performance and is not actual client performance. Only data for the IFA Index Portfolios is shown net of IFA's highest advisory fee and the underlying mutual fund expenses. All other data, including the IFA Indexes, does not reflect a deduction of advisory fees. None of the data reflects trading costs or taxes, which would have lowered performance by these costs. See more important disclosures at ifabt.com.

© 1999-2019 Index Fund Advisors, Inc. All Rights Reserved | 19200 Von Karman Ave. Suite 150 Irvine, CA 92612 | 888-643-3133